Coffin & Casket History

Custom Built One At A Time

Custom Built One At A Time

By Louis C. Farah.

It’s amazing how many people look at a vintage professional car and assume that they were factory-built cars that came off of an assembly line somewhere in Detroit. It’s easy to understand why people would believe that considering the master craftsmanship that went into the construction of each car that rolled out of the doors of such well-known manufacturers as Miller, Meteor, Flxible, Superior and Eureka. That expertise and innovation becomes even more evident when we look at the smaller builders such as National, Cotner/Bevington and Seibert.

However, if one were to visit the hearse builders of today (there are no manufacturers of ambulances on a passenger car chassis in America anymore) they would definitely see an assembly line operation where standardized bodies are mated with a stripped-down Cadillac or Lincoln chassis to make a funeral car. A lot has changed in the past 30 years with the demise of the passenger car-based ambulance.

Gone are the days of custom-built bodies that made professional cars appear as if they were standard automotive bodies that were altered by the manufacturers. What most people don’t realize is the fact that those that designed and constructed these cars intentionally built these vehicles to resemble ordinary factory- build cars that the public bought themselves. The same flowing lines as those cars appearing in the showrooms of Cadillac dealers were no accident. Rather than produce a car with a strange and bulky looking style that left no doubt that this was nothing more than a ‘butcher job” on a luxury car, master craftsmen made professional cars a thing of beauty and dignity. Gone were the days of the horse and buggy. By the 1930’s, professional cars were stately and offered a high degree of integrity and prestige to the funeral director or ambulance operator.

The bodies were custom-built based on the customer’s exacting standards and specific order. These were not cookie-cutter vehicles by any means. Interior appointments, emergency lighting, sirens, casket table specifications, curtains, window treatments and virtually every part of the car was custom built from scratch depending on what the customer ordered. When one looks in the gallery at the gorgeous examples of the cars that were built by the the coachbuilders of the past, it’s easy to see why people thought these cars were built in a Cadillac factory instead of the independent professional car builders of the time. The flowing lines of the car were perfectly matched to the custom bodies that were built. Using the same chrome trim, fender styles, tail lights and other parts provided the perfect blend of design and practicality.

Unfortunately, professional cars built today (primarily hearses) are cookie cutter vehicles that no longer emulate custom- build bodies that match traditional passenger car styling of a particular year or vehicle make. For the past 30 years, manufactured bodies that have been used on a variety of chassis such as Cadillac, Buick and Chevrolet are the same with little or no variance in style. The art of master craftsmen has been lost, especially with the consolidation of Eureka, Miller-Meteor, S&S and Superior under the banner of Accubuilt.

Although the professional cars of today are certainly more quality built and technologically advanced from their predecessors, the progression of design and construction has resulted in a loss of style and uniqueness that perhaps may be lost forever. You would be hard pressed to tell the difference between most professional cars, especially in determining what year a particular car is. The price of progress appears to have been the loss of uniqueness.

As far as vintage cars club are concerned, it is our responsibility as those that have chosen the field of professional cars to do our best to acquire these unique vehicles and protect their historical value. Although we certainly accept any and all professional cars in PCI, the many would agree that the most collectible cars are those from the 1930’s through the 1970’s. Believe it or not, in a mechanical sense, these are perhaps the easiest to restore and maintain. Most of the parts can be found at such auto parts outlets as Pep Boys, Trak Auto, Auto Zone and NAPA stores. If you’re looking for fuel pumps, carburetors, wiper blades, water pumps, spark plugs and other bolt-on parts, most can be purchased for under $40.

However, beware of simply buying a part for your particular year and make of vehicle. Professional cars were not built nor assembled by the chassis distributor. Cadillac did not build these cars: Miller- Meteor, Superior, Cotner/Bevington and S&S built them. There are vast differences in the suspension, braking and drive train components as compared to the everyday cars that were delivered from Detroit. That’s another reason for the camaraderie among professional car enthusiasts: Getting accurate restoration information from someone that knows your car and has been there before.

The only daunting task regarding these older cars is body work. Body parts for vehicles from the 1960’s and 1970’s are still readily available on the West Coast and Southwest areas of the country due to the low instance of rust. However, the older the car, and the closer to the East Coast that one travels, the less likely you will be able to find a rust-free fender, chrome piece or other external body part.

Master craftsmen may have built these cars, but it is now up to us to restore and maintain these special vehicles. That’s just as important in the professional car hobby as owning the car!

Reprinted with permission from the July 2009 Issue of the “Professional Car Collector” magazine.  The official publication of Professional Cars International.  PCI Club Information can be found HERE.

Discuss this article in our Forums HERE.

NYFD Ambulance

Inside an LAFD Ambulance

History of The Hearse

History: Vintage Medical Devices

Did Those Old Medical Devices Really Work?
by
Louis Farah

Many years ago I attended a Los Angeles County paramedic update class. These are a part of my yearly continuing education that introduces new medical procedures for field use and/or any changes to county protocols.
Sitting with a bunch of old salts like myself that have been playing the paramedic game since the 1970’s, we marveled at the number of changes we’ve seen in medical care throughout the years.

At one time my paramedic unit carried five different pain medications, each used for something different; Demerol for muscle pain, Morphine for chest pain, Valium and Phenobarbital for seizures and Talwin for fractures.
We carried five different IV solutions and a variety of drugs used for drips. Paramedic units in Los Angeles County were stocked with virtually everything found in an emergency room because our paramedic program was still considered a “pilot program” that allowed emergency room physicians the latitude to order any medical procedure they felt was necessary to save a patient’s life.

The Wedworth-Townsend Act opened the door for paramedic programs throughout California. Unfortunately there were no standardized protocols for treatment. Each county had the ability to design and develop their own programs, and as a result, paramedic field treatment was as varied as the number of counties with paramedics.

However, one aspect of paramedic care was constant: The equipment we used.

Long before the advent of paramedics, ambulance services were using virtually the same emergency equipment made by a handful of manufacturers.

Early Resuscitators

Perhaps the most advanced piece of equipment in the early days of EMS was the use and delivery of supplemental oxygen via the resuscitator. Vintage equipment such as the old Emerson units used large and heavy tanks to power a device that forced air into the lungs of a patient. The standard procedure for anyone having breathing difficulties was the practice of putting a mask on their face with a tight seal to inflate the lungs.
Unfortunately, few of these people survived because the underlying cause of the medical emergency wasn’t alleviated by simply forcing oxygen into the lungs. However, for drowning victims and those overcome by smoke, the benefits far outweighed the negatives, so these units found a home on ambulances across the nation.

These resuscitators definitely had their limitations: They were big, heavy and bulky; It took two strong men to transport the unit from the ambulance to the patient; and they “cycled”.

Cycling was a design built into the system. To prevent damage to the lungs from over-inflation, once the resuscitator reached 40 pounds per-square-inch in pressure, the unit stopped pumping oxygen.
For those that suffered from chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, 40 pounds of pressure wasn’t enough to fill the lungs with air. As a result, for those patients with any type of obstructive lung disease, the Emerson resuscitator did more harm than good.

By the 1950’s, the theory of rescue breathing was making huge advancements. Although CPR had yet to be applied in a field setting, the medical community was starting to embrace the practice by numerous methods of rescue breathing including the use of the old arm-lift method, and eventually mouth-to-mouth rescue breathing.

With the evolution of the manual resuscitator, one of the most famous and well-known pieces of oxygen equipment came into vogue:
The green-cased E&J “Lifeport” oxygen resuscitator.

The good old E&J became the standard of the industry. Both the Los Angeles City and County Fire Departments used it as standard equipment on all of their apparatus, as did most other fire departments across the country. It too operated much like the Emerson unit, but it was much smaller and utilized lightweight “D” sized oxygen cylinders.

Both the Emerson and E&J resuscitators depended on the patient’s ability to breath in the oxygen in order to be beneficial. With the limitation of the cycling feature, those needing rescue breathing benefited little from the devices.

Perhaps the greatest advancement in the delivery of oxygen was the demand valve. At the press of a button, high-flow oxygen could be forced into the lungs without the worry of the device cycling, and thus, discontinuing the flow of oxygen into the lungs.

For rescue breathing on the go, the formidable ambu-bag was introduced in the 1960’s to ventilate a patient in distress. With the advent of cardio-pulmonary resuscitation, two rescuers could perform chest compressions and provide adequate oxygenation to a person with reasonable success.
The ambu-bag is used today as the primary mode of delivering rescue breathing to a patient outside of the hospital emergency room. The most widely used in-house device remains the ventilator, which can deliver a variety of oxygen concentrations and ventilation pressures and settings. The 1980’s saw the discontinuance of the demand valve resuscitator because of concerns associated with possible over-inflation of the lungs. Without a “pop-off” valve to prevent inflation pressure of above 40 pounds per-square-inch, the medical community seems to be more at ease with the ambu-bag that has that capability.

Even with the advancements of airway control with such devices as the endotracheal tube, the ambu-bag has undergone design changes to improve the delivery of oxygen into the lungs. Today’s ambu-bags have long connecting reservoir tubes to ensure 100% oxygen concentrations in the bag prior to deflation; New snap-on filters have color indicators to confirm the exchange of inhaled oxygen and exhaled carbon dioxide.

Although the old Emerson and E&J resuscitators are a huge part of EMS history and are standard props in our professional vehicles, their usefulness in today’s modern world of medicine has fallen by the wayside. However, before the advancement of emergency medical care, they were the standard of the industry.

Suction Devices

Just as important as delivering oxygen to a patient’s lungs was the establishment of a clear airway to facilitate the delivery of the oxygen to a patient’s lungs.

Perhaps the earliest device for clearing an airway was the simple bulb syringe. In fact, the bulb syringe is used today to clear the airway of an infant during delivery and a larger syringe can be used to clear fluids from the mouth and throat from most adults. However, when a larger volume of debris needs to be removed, the mighty Rico suction unit has become standard equipment in nearly all ambulances operating in this country.

The Rico suction unit gained popularity in the 1960’s because of the pressure generated by the suction unit and the large canister used to collect the secretions provided a much improved way of clearing a patient’s airway in an emergency. Whether the obstruction was blood or vomit, the Rico unit had the power and the capacity to handle the job.

There have been two units used in the field. The first was powered by manual suction created from the engine manifold of the ambulance being used. A hose was connected to the intake manifold and routed to the suction unit itself. Using the suction power of the engine, debris could be suctioned up into the catch canister. The power of the suction depended on the amount of suction generated by the ambulance’s intake manifold, which varied from ambulance to ambulance.

However, the cost of the suction unit was relatively cheap because early models did not have an independent motor that powered the unit. The mechanics were simple: Hook one end of the suction hose to the ambulance’s engine, hook the other end of the hose to the suction unit, and you were in business.

The modern Rico suction unit did away with the use of the engine’s manifold as the main source of suction in favor of a new unit that featured it’s own suction motor. The pressure generated by the motor was more consistent and could be regulated to meet the needs of individual patient requirements. Today, a suction unit is standard equipment in every ambulance manufactured in America.

As time went on, other companies entered the market with lighter and more compact devices. The Laedal Company produced a fine line of portable suction units that were powered by rechargeable batteries. Soon they became a standard as well. With the vast acceptance of the Laedal units, Rico soon concentrated their efforts on vehicle-based suction units while Laedal took over the portable market.

Entering the Modern Age of Paramedics

Basic life support devices such as oxygen tanks, resuscitators, ambu-bags and suction units have changed little prior to 1969. Yes, some improvements were made to make them more efficient. But the most significant evolution in the field of emergency medical services was the development of the paramedic.

No longer would citizens have to depend on a fast ride at break-neck speed to the nearest hospital to receive comprehensive emergency medical care. That advanced level of medical care would be brought to the scene of an emergency and the same high tech equipment used in the hospital would be used as well.

Perhaps the two most important tools were the portable heart monitor/defibrillator developed by the Datascope Corporation and the portable radio designed by Biocom.

Together, these two pieces of equipment brought those who had died back to life, or prevented one from dying.

Those experiencing cardiac arrest outside of an emergency room were doomed to a virtual death sentence. Without quick defibrillation, they would pass from “clinical death” to “biological death” with no possible chance for survival.

The use of the Datascope heart monitor/defibrillator, coupled with the proper cardiac drugs and the delivery of a counter-shock in a timely manner could convert a fatal heart rhythm into a normal heartbeat and save countless lives.

The use of the heart monitor/defibrillator with the patient’s electrocardiogram being transmitted to the hospital via the Biocom radio put a paramedic in direct contact with an emergency room physician. The physician could see the heart rhythm the paramedic was seeing in the field, and timely treatment was initiated to prevent a potentially-fatal heart rhythms from occurring.

The impact was immediate.

Prior to the introduction of paramedics, nearly 90% of all cardiac cases never made it to the hospital alive. A heart attack outside of a hospital meant certain death. Today, over 90% of all heart related patients not only make it to the hospital alive, but they survive and go on to live productive lives.

Most cardiac monitor/defibrillators today are standard tools in treating a variety of cardiac emergencies. Developments during the last thirty years include the use of twelve leads to view the entire heart from front to back, and heart pacing capabilities for those patients in acute heart failure. Some units, such as the Life Pack 12, even record voice conversation at the scene of the emergency for documentation at a later time.

Perhaps the most important piece of equipment was (and still is) the radio used by the paramedic base station hospital that receives the assessment and report from the paramedics and relays back medical treatment to the paramedics in the field.

The base station radio not only receives voice transmissions from paramedic crews, but receives the patient’s EKG rhythm as well. Advanced life support treatment is much more sophisticated than ever before and current protocols require much more documentation of medical conditions before and after treating the patient.

At the time of their use, these medical devices were considered state-of-the-art and were widely used. Just as the ambulance has improved in performance, style and convenience, medical devices have steadily improved to meet the new protocols of emergency medical care in a pre-hospital setting.

For those of us that have been involved in the field of emergency medical services since the 1970’s, the changes have been astonishing. We are doing medical procedures and using equipment that is even more advanced than ever before.

As to the question of did these devices actually work?

Yes, indeed they did!

Louis Farah is a professional car collector and historian as well as being an active Paramedic in the Los Angeles area.

History: Funeral directors & Ambulance Service

Why Did The Funeral Director Quit The Ambulance Business?

By: Jim Crabtree

Why exactly did the funeral director quit the ambulance business?  This is a question that I have wondered about for a long time.  The old adages about the lack of care or lack of interest and training do not hold-up to the fact that the funeral director was in the ambulance business for 50 years before he abandoned it to the rescue squads and fire departments.

In The Beginning

Let’s begin our search by looking at why he got into it in the first place.  Before the Civil War ambulances were pretty much unknown.  In the 1800’s and earlier when civilians became sick or injured, the doctor came to them in the form of house calls.  Medical technology had not progressed beyond equipping the doctor with any more items than he could carry in the classical “little black bag”.  At the time of the Civil War the equivalent of a hospital pharmacy could be carried easily on a horse’s back.  There was no need to bring the patient to the hospital, because the hospital could just as easily come to them.  The prescription for disease and disability at that time was generally simple bed rest anyway, and this could just as easily be arranged for at the home.

There were some large cities (generally European) that maintained wagons to transport the sick but they might just as well be used to pick-up the dead as to transport the living.  Little actual curing went on in hospitals before medical science discovered such important concepts as bacteria and antibiotics, and abandoned such treatments as bloodletting.  Hospitals at the beginning of the 19th Century were little better than the streets as a place to die while being cared for by nurses whom might as well have been prostitutes and doctors who would today be considered charlatans and butchers.

Wartime Advances

The need to efficiently provide some care for massive numbers of casualties at central locations during wartime led to the production of ambulance wagons.  Before the American Civil War, the battlefield wounded might lay on the field for days before being removed to a designated treatment area.  Soldiers used to pray that they would be killed quickly in combat rather than becoming wounded.  There were few disabled veterans from the Revolutionary War:  You either came through unscathed, or died on the field.  Caring for the wounded took a lot of resources that were viewed as being better spent on people who could still fight.  Specific surgical procedures and medical treatments that were aimed at recovery did not begin until Florence Nightingale worked during the Crimea War, and battlefield evacuations as a routine procedure did not start until the Civil War.

After every war the increases in medical knowledge (usually trauma care) find their way into the civilian world.  Battlefield trauma management has probably done more than anything else to prove the value of surgical intervention.  Surgeons were not allowed to experimentally cut the bodies during peacetime.  But during war they were allowed to perfect their techniques and show that under the right conditions their “cutting” could “cure”.  These conditions existed in a hospital operating room.  As the world’s surgeons became more skilled, the reasons to bring patients to the hospital increased.  And who in town had a vehicle that could transport a sick person in a lying position?  Why, the undertaker, of course!

Ambulance service began as an outgrowth of the need to transport human bodies supine.  As an added advantage, operating the ambulance service helped to improve the public image of the local mortician, and could result in business tips and referrals about who was dying and who was already dead.  There are numerous anecdotes about a funeral director’s ambulance headed for the hospital until the patient died, then they would “conveniently” continue on to the funeral home.  And guess who got the job of burial?

The Ambulance Part of the Funeral Business

Funeral directors continued this arrangement well into the 1950’s.  They used their ambulance service to desensitize the morbid aspects of their business.  They would pass out telephone stickers that listed the name of their mortuary under “emergency ambulance”.  People wouldn’t keep the name or advertising from an undertaker in their home but they would proudly display the same phone number on their list of people to call in an emergency!

What did it cost the funeral director to operate an ambulance?  I don’t think most funeral directors really knew.  My studies of the funeral industry in postwar America shows that the morticians of that time were generally very nice people, but horrible businessmen.  They managed to operate mortuaries on caseloads of less than 100 per year, sometimes as low as 50-60 cases per year.  Imagine making a profit on a little more than one funeral a week, AND operating the ambulance.  Postwar America was a prosperous time and funeral directors were often building impressive structures and chapels.  They were buying new automotive equipment frequently in an effort to keep up with the funeral home down the street.  But did they know how to pay for all of this expansion and acquisition?  In 1959, there was an article in Mortuary Management magazine explaining how to depreciate the value of a professional car against business income to insure that there would be enough capital in the business to replace that car 4 or 5 years hence.  Imagine needing to explain this basic accounting concept to people who should have been shrewd businessmen.  Where were their accountants???

(Hobby note:  This practice of repetitive purchases has actually benefited us today as it managed to keep 5 or more professional car manufacturers setting continual sales records and left us today with a legacy of automotive art to collect).

Funeral Directors and Accounts Receivable

Funeral Directors were too often nice guys about collecting their debts.  They frequently allowed their bills to be paid out of estates. This meant that they would perform a funeral service (including giving cash up-front to clergy, cemeteries, and government recording offices), then wait six months to a year or longer for probate to be settled before they got paid.  Think what this did to their cash flow!  Because of the screwy things that happen in probate, they might never get paid.  Consider the following true story:

A man is in the middle of a divorce.  He lives near his parents in a town away from his wife.  When he dies, his parents arrange for the funeral, and the mortician allows to have his bill to be paid out of the estate.  Because he was not actually divorced yet, the wife now inherits all of his assets.  And because the parents arranged the funeral (not the wife), she is found not to be responsible for the debt.  The undertaker forgot to get the parents to guarantee the funeral contract.  This case actually made it up to the Supreme Court, and the funeral director lost.  He was out the entire expense of the funeral.

Not very smart from a business sense, but illustrates how trusting funeral home directors were.  In the funeral literature there is no end to the number of free funerals that the industry gave away.  It seemed that whenever there was a disaster involving multiple deaths of the very poor (such as a tenement fire or a mass murder) some funeral director would step forward and perform the service for free, including the caskets!  Sometimes the caskets would be donated by a casket manufacturer.

The funeral industry cash flow became such a crisis that in August of 1961, the Casket Manufacturers Association officially voted to stop the shipment of units to funeral homes that were more than 90 days delinquent in their purchases.

By inference this meant that 60 day overdue accounts were so routine as to be normal, and accounts overdue greater than 90 days were common as well.  (Try getting your mortgage bank to go for that one!)

By 1965, advertisements were commonly being run in funeral trade journals by companies that would buy “uncollected debt” offering 90% of the total accounts from zero to 90 days graduating down to 1% for accounts that were five years old.  I do not see how anyone can run a business while holding on to and not collecting 5 year old accounts.

In his defense, the funeral director did not always work as hard as he could to collect accounts receivable because he was commonly owed money by the people that he lived with.

He knew that the local widow did not have the any funds since he husband passed away, and he didn’t want to be seen as the nasty greedy money collector taking somebody’s last dime, ESPECIALLY after they had just suffered “a death in the family”.  So how did he stay in business?  Creative accounting.  He charged enough from the people who could pay that the business managed to show some kind of profit at the end of the year.  He was also aided by the fact that it was a family-run business, and the labor costs of family members were considered negligible because salaries would be drawn only during good times.

Economics of an Ambulance Service

Mixed into this crazy business environment was the ambulance service.  This side of the business required 24 hour labor coverage, increased vehicle maintenance on a coach that was sure to be driven hard and the job of trying to calculate the cost and inventory of supplies used per run that even today baffles modern computer systems.  Training wasn’t much.  A Red Cross Advanced First Aid card was the most that was required and renewal wasn’t much of a problem.  Many of the persons transported, of course, did not pay any part of the presented bill, so their costs would be added to the inter-facility transport bills that did pay.  In the end it was much easier to conceal this hidden overhead in a funeral service than in an ambulance run.  This is how most funeral home ambulance services were operated until the late 1950’s or early 1960’s.

The Ambulance Tackles Technology

During the late 1950’s technology began to catch-up with the ambulance.  Supplemental oxygen became the standard of care.  Resuscitators, inhalators and Rico suction units became necessities.  In order to operate these devices, additional training was required.  Basic CPR training led to the Emergency Medical Technician curriculum we have today.  All of this training costs something, and the increased costs were often hidden in the price of funerals, not the ambulance runs.

To be fair, it would not be unusual for the allowable charges of ambulance service to be regulated by local laws that might tie the hands of the funeral director as to how much he could charge for his services.  The U.S. has a history of feeling that all EMS work should be free, or next to it.

The first reference that I find to funeral directors screaming “uncle” came in January of 1960.  It was then that a letter of inquiry was published in Mortuary Management from a funeral home asking for suggestions from readers on how to dump their ambulance business and not lose the goodwill that had been built-up in their town over the years.  (How not to be seen as the person who left the community without emergency medical transport.)  Most of the respondents said that they too had tried, but eliminating the ambulance service could not be done.  Another entered into an agreement with his competitor that if they both dropped out of the service, the town would have to pick-up the slack.  At the eleventh hour the competition re-established service in a coup to take over.  It worked.

Enter Jessica Midford

In 1963, Jessica Midford published a book entitled The American Way of Death.  Jessica was an average woman who found herself having to arrange her mother’s funeral.  She entered into the funeral industry at the height of their “creative accounting” phase.  She found that she could not compare prices between funeral homes because they did not give-out pricing information over the phone.  She could not compare costs and services between competing homes because all of their services were rolled into the price of the casket.

She could not adjust the price of a funeral by declining services that she did not want (i.e., use of chapel, use of limo, embalming, etc.) because funeral homes routinely rolled everything into one package deal.  Her entire book spotlighted on these unethical (today illegal) practices that some (most) funeral homes engaged in at that time.  This book changed an industry probably more than any book has changed an industry in history.

The result were laws being passed forcing (sometimes strongly encouraging) funeral homes to compete on a price basis, disclose the costs of all services and refrain from selling any unwanted or non-required services.  Because the funeral side of the industry now had to stand on its own economically, the costs of the ambulance service could no longer be hidden in the price of the funerals.

The 1966 ICC Ruling

In 1966, the Federal government in the form of the Interstate Commerce Commission made a significant change to the ambulance industry.  The ICC is the governing body that among other things, creates the rules that long-haul truckers must follow.

Generally these rules are in the spirit of public safety.  Rules that govern safe operation of trucks, including how long a driver can be behind the wheel, make the roads safer for everyone.  In 1966 the ICC stated that because ambulance services conducted business on Federal highways, they fell under the jurisdiction of their rules and those of the Fair Labor Standards Act.

Because most ambulance drivers do not actually drive longer than the maximum hours required, that provision wasn’t a problem.  However, the problem arose out of the fact that minimum hourly wages and benefits had to be paid to ambulance personnel whenever they were employed.  This included all stand-by and sleep time.  This was most likely the fatal economic blow to funeral-based ambulance services.  They could no longer hide their salaries by employing family members or other funeral home workers as stand-by attendants.

The White Paper Report

Also in 1966, the National Academy of Science published a “White Paper” report entitled Accidental Death and Disability:  The Neglected Disease of Modern Society.  This report outlined how poor automobile design, poor design of both highway surfaces and accessories (light posts, sign posts, etc.), and the lack of adequate training of ambulance attendants caused increased morbidity and mortality.  Out of this came the Highway Safety Act and the DOT curriculum for the Emergency Medical Technician (EMT) program.

This was the final straw.  It would not be possible for funeral home employees to remain current in their primary profession (embalming and funeral directing) while also training and retraining as EMTs.  The funeral director now had a perfect justification for relinquishing emergency care to people who wanted to provide it, and more importantly, encouragement from the community to practice their primary profession of funerals while suffering no ill will from the community from leaving them abandoned.  In the end, it was the community requesting the funeral director to give-up the ambulance service.

Jim Crabtree is a noted Professional Car Historian and has been an integral part of the EMS and Disaster training programs in Los Angeles County.

Electronic Sirens – A discussion.

Electronic Sirens on Emergency Vehicles
ANOTHER “FAILED EXPERIMENT” FROM THE SIXTIES?
By
Kevin O’Connell

Are you still wearing corduroy bell bottoms? Nehru jackets? Beatle boots? Shag haircuts? Paisley shirts? Ben Franklin sunglasses?

Do you still refer to a raincoat and wading boots as turnouts? Do people still ride your tailboards with impunity?

Listening to “Boss Hits” on your 4 track? Driving a “really groovy” VW bus with tie-dyed curtains?

Hopefully your answers to these questions are all emphatically negative. Thankfully many of you are too young to remember the embarrassing things people did twenty five to thirty years ago (as if you could care – you’re too busy tattooing and piercing yourselves so you’ll have something to be embarrassed about in the future).

Why then, do many agencies still cling to another bad idea from the sixties; the electronic siren? After all, they seem to do a better job of instilling false confidence than actually warning other drivers. The answers and excuses I’ve heard over the years are numerous and nearly always rooted in myth or ignorance. In the interest of brevity, let’s just debunk the three most common notions:

Read more

Casket Lowering Device